Risk & strategy
learning path.
From a position size to an evidence-based process. Work through 18 lessons in order, or return to the stage that needs more attention.

Get the mechanics right
Build a vocabulary you can use without hiding behind it.
- Position sizing: start with the loss Beginner · 6 min
- Orders, stops and the price you actually get Beginner · 6 min
- Read charts without inventing certainty Beginner · 5 min
- Probability, expectancy and losing streaks Intermediate · 5 min
- Backtesting without self-deception Intermediate · 5 min
- Build a journal that tells the truth Beginner · 5 min
Connect the moving parts
Bring product structure, costs and decisions into the same explanation.
- Correlation, concentration and drawdowns Intermediate · 5 min
- Create a complete paper-trading plan Beginner · 6 min
- Kelly sizing: the fragile bridge from edge to exposure Advanced · 8 min
- Stress tests: model the chain of failure Advanced · 8 min
- Walk-forward validation: keep tomorrow out of training Advanced · 8 min
- Portfolio risk: what the weights conceal Advanced · 8 min
Challenge the comfortable assumptions
Study the situations where a simple model or confident narrative breaks down.
- Regime shifts: adapting without chasing every wobble Advanced · 8 min
- Implementation shortfall: account for the decision you could not fill Advanced · 8 min
- Multiple testing: when the best backtest is a lucky accident Advanced · 8 min
- Tail risk: what VaR leaves beyond the threshold Advanced · 8 min
- Risk budgets: allocate uncertainty, not just dollars Advanced · 8 min
- Strategy capacity: when a small edge cannot absorb a large order Advanced · 8 min
Check the rule, the account and the evidence
Keep three records together: the decision rule, the account calculation and the evidence used to justify the rule. A correctly sized position can still belong to an unprofitable process. Conversely, an attractive historical average does not remove gaps, correlated losses or a cash deadline. Ask which of these three questions each lesson actually answers.
Use one hypothetical plan across the stages. If planned loss is 100 and execution produces a loss of 140, preserve both figures and explain the extra 40; do not redefine the original budget after the event. Write the condition for pausing the experiment before seeing its results. Later improvements create a new version to test, not retroactive evidence that the first version worked.